Abstract
Since 1960, American behavioral scientists and clinicians have widely endorsed behavior modification techniques based on learning theory. A large segment of these specialists has been particularly interested in use of response-focused operant conditioning. Because of its popular acceptance, its nature, its effectiveness, and its rapid application as a clinical method for effecting behavioral change, operant conditioning deserves ethical scrutiny that some scientists are now giving it. If ethics may be defined as the systematic study of nature of value concepts and of general principles that justify application of value judgments to human affairs (L. J. West, p. 229, 1969), some scientists are wondering about this technique which aims to engineer preselected, specific changes in behavior of human beings. With only rare exceptions it is psychodynamically oriented scientists who are questioning values inherent in operant conditioning. They are raising their questions not solely out of ignorance,
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
