An ethical framework for counseling about mode of delivery for desired psychosocial benefit in pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies

Abstract

Abstract Background A fetal diagnosis poses ethical challenges when a woman requests elective cesarean delivery for psychosocial reasons. We address the ethical challenges of counseling such patients. Case presentation A 36-year-old G4P2012 has chosen to continue a pregnancy despite a high likelihood of trisomy 18. At 36.5 weeks she was admitted for preeclampsia with severe features and requested to be delivered by primary cesarean section. Due to the poor prognosis associated with trisomy 18, the patient’s request for cesarean delivery was declined even when her baby changed to breech presentation with Category 2 fetal heart rate (FHT). The patient subsequently experienced a traumatic stillbirth and post-traumatic shock disorder (PTSD). Conclusion The obstetrician’s goal should be to transform the patient’s request into an informed decision. The obstetrician should explain that, while a cesarean could increase the likelihood of a live birth, it will not alter long-term neonatal outcomes and entails net biomedical risk for the current and future pregnancies. The obstetrician should ensure that the patient understands these clinical realities. The obstetrician should support the patient’s decision-making about whether to accept the risks of cesarean delivery for psychosocial benefit. The obstetrician should initiate counseling during prenatal visits to empower the patient with information to meaningfully exercise her autonomy. If the patient makes an informed decision for cesarean delivery, it becomes ethically permissible. Plans regarding intrapartum management and mode of delivery should be documented in case the patient is delivered by a physician who was not involved in prenatal counseling.