Abstract
The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle includes taking into account economic and societal factors. To consider these factors, decision-aiding techniques such as cost-benefit analysis were introduced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 50 y ago. Over the years, developments in health economics have led to new ways of deriving the concept of a value of a statistical life (VSL), which now is influencing the monetary value assigned to a unit of collective dose for radiological protection purposes (the α value) used in cost-benefit analyses. The aim of the present study was to estimate an α value useful for occupational radiological protection within the healthcare system of Sweden. A survey based on the stated preference approach was developed and sent to staff who are exposed to ionizing radiation at their work in Region Västra Götaland (Sweden). The survey essentially contained two scenarios: the respondents' willingness to pay for measures against radon exposure at home and their willingness to accept compensation for x-ray exposure at work. Answers from 718 respondents were collected. In the sensitivity analysis of the survey, the overall median VSL based on the two scenarios was calculated to be $50 million (IQR $10 to 363 million). The corresponding α value was established to $1,600 person-mSv -1 ($2,100 person-mSv -1 if excess burden of taxes is excluded). The recommended α value is in the high end compared to other studies but within the interval of values being used by nuclear utilities today. The α value should be seen in the light of ICRP's recommendation about stakeholder involvement as an important part of the optimization process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.