Abstract

Abstract. Remote-sensing devices such as lidars are currently being investigated as alternatives to cup anemometers on meteorological towers for the measurement of wind speed and direction. Although lidars can measure mean wind speeds at heights spanning an entire turbine rotor disk and can be easily moved from one location to another, they measure different values of turbulence than an instrument on a tower. Current methods for improving lidar turbulence estimates include the use of analytical turbulence models and expensive scanning lidars. While these methods provide accurate results in a research setting, they cannot be easily applied to smaller, vertically profiling lidars in locations where high-resolution sonic anemometer data are not available. Thus, there is clearly a need for a turbulence error reduction model that is simpler and more easily applicable to lidars that are used in the wind energy industry. In this work, a new turbulence error reduction algorithm for lidars is described. The Lidar Turbulence Error Reduction Algorithm, L-TERRA, can be applied using only data from a stand-alone vertically profiling lidar and requires minimal training with meteorological tower data. The basis of L-TERRA is a series of physics-based corrections that are applied to the lidar data to mitigate errors from instrument noise, volume averaging, and variance contamination. These corrections are applied in conjunction with a trained machine-learning model to improve turbulence estimates from a vertically profiling WINDCUBE v2 lidar. The lessons learned from creating the L-TERRA model for a WINDCUBE v2 lidar can also be applied to other lidar devices. L-TERRA was tested on data from two sites in the Southern Plains region of the United States. The physics-based corrections in L-TERRA brought regression line slopes much closer to 1 at both sites and significantly reduced the sensitivity of lidar turbulence errors to atmospheric stability. The accuracy of machine-learning methods in L-TERRA was highly dependent on the input variables and training dataset used, suggesting that machine learning may not be the best technique for reducing lidar turbulence intensity (TI) error. Future work will include the use of a lidar simulator to better understand how different factors affect lidar turbulence error and to determine how these errors can be reduced using information from a stand-alone lidar.

Highlights

  • As turbine hub heights increase and wind energy expands to complex and offshore sites, new measurements of the wind resource are needed to inform decisions about site suitability and turbine selection

  • Throughout this work, the process of “correcting” lidar turbulence refers to techniques that are used to bring lidar turbulence estimates closer to the turbulence that would be measured by a cup or sonic anemometer and “error” is used as a synonym for “difference”

  • To reduce variance contamination caused by the Doppler-beam swinging (DBS) and velocity–azimuth display (VAD; Browning and Wexler, 1968) techniques, Sathe et al (2015b) proposed a new sixbeam scanning technique for Doppler lidars that utilizes the variance of the radial velocity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As turbine hub heights increase and wind energy expands to complex and offshore sites, new measurements of the wind resource are needed to inform decisions about site suitability and turbine selection. Most of these measurements are collected by cup anemometers on meteorological (met) towers. Turbulence measurements are used to classify potential wind farm sites and select suitable turbines (International Electrotechnical Commission, 2005) and can impact power production (e.g., Elliott and Cadogan, 1990; Peinke et al, 2004; Clifton and Wagner, 2014).

Background
Lidar technology
Errors in lidar data
Current methods for correcting lidar turbulence
Fitting a turbulence model
Six-beam method
Multiple lidars
Structure functions
Doppler spectrum
Summary
TI error model
Preprocessing
Instrument noise
Volume averaging
Variance contamination
Machine learning
Comparison to previous methods
Measurement sites
Stability classification
Comparison of mean wind speed and TI
L-TERRA results
Initial version of L-TERRA
Stability-dependent version of L-TERRA
Effects of stability misclassification
Application of machine-learning techniques
Determination of predictor variables
Results from trained machine-learning model
Findings
Conclusions and future work
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call