Abstract

This paper considers an equilibrium asset pricing model in a static pure exchange economy under ambiguity. Ambiguity preference is represented by the dual theory of the smooth ambiguity model [6]. We show the existence and the uniqueness of the equilibrium in the economy and derive the state price density (SPD). The equilibrium excess return, which can be seen as an extension of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) under risk to ambiguity, is derived from the SPD. We also determine the effects of ambiguity preference on the excess returns of ambiguous securities through comparative statics of the SPD.

Highlights

  • The state price density (SPD) is a central concept in modern asset pricing theory.1 Given the SPD and its probability distribution, we can price every asset.it is essential to derive the SPD for asset pricing

  • Using the SPD, we extend the classical capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to an economy under ambiguity

  • This paper studies an equilibrium asset pricing model for a static pure exchange economy with ambiguity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The state price density (SPD) is a central concept in modern asset pricing theory. Given the SPD and its probability distribution, we can price every asset. As shown in [6], an equivalent representation of the dual theory is the “single” expected utility with respect to a mixture of the first-order probability distributions with the distorted second-order probability distribution This form reinforces the advantage of the original theory that the existing results in the expected utility are applicable to decision problems under ambiguity, while maintaining descriptive validity for ambiguity. Ambiguity preference does not explicitly appear for most of the main analysis While this tractability is a distinct advantage compared with existing models, ambiguity preferences have an effect on equilibria in securities markets. We clarify these effects through comparative statics of the SPD.

The Model
Equilibrium
Asset Pricing
Some Comparative Statics
Concluding Remarks
Proof of Proposition 3
Proof of Corollary 2
Proof of Proposition 6
Proof of Proposition 7
Proof of Corollary 3

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.