Abstract

The present technical note aimed at enriching the planar linked segment model originally proposed by Chaffin with the prediction of the moment arm and of the orientation of the line of action of the back extensor muscles during symmetric lifting tasks. The prediction equations proposed by van Dieen and de Looze for their single equivalent muscle model were used for such a purpose. Their prediction was based on the thorax-to-pelvis flexion angle as computed from 3D video-based motion capture. In order to make these prediction equations compliant with a two-dimensional analysis, the planar angle formed by the segment joining L5/S1 to the shoulder with the longitudinal axis of the pelvis was introduced. This newly computed planar trunk flexion angle was used to feed van Dieen and de Looze’s equations, comparing the results with the original model. A full-body Plug-in-Gait model relative to 10 subjects performing manual lifting activities using a stoop and a squat technique was used for model validation. A strong association was found between the proposed planar trunk flexion angle and that used by van Dieen and de Looze (r = 0.970). A strong association and a high level of agreement were found between the back extensor muscle moment arm (r = 0.965; bias < 0.001 m; upper limit of agreement (LOA) = 0.002 m; lower LOA < 0.001 m) and the orientation of the line of action (r = 0.970; bias = 2.8°; upper LOA = 5.3°; lower LOA = 0.2°) as computed using the two methods. For both the considered variables, the prediction error fell within the model sensitivity.

Highlights

  • Quantifying the loads stressing the lumbar spine during manual lifting activities is crucial for assessing the risk of work-related low back pain [1,2]

  • A strong association was found between the proposed planar trunk flexion angle and that used by van Dieen and de Looze (r = 0.970)

  • A strong association and a high level of agreement were found between the back extensor muscle moment arm (r = 0.965; bias < 0.001 m; upper limit of agreement (LOA) = 0.002 m; lower LOA < 0.001 m) and the orientation of the line of action (r = 0.970; bias = 2.8◦ ; upper LOA = 5.3◦ ; lower LOA = 0.2◦ ) as computed using the two methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying the loads stressing the lumbar spine during manual lifting activities is crucial for assessing the risk of work-related low back pain [1,2]. Spinal loads are usually identified as the compressive and shear forces acting on one of the lumbar intervertebral disc centers. The earliest approach for the determination of such forces through indirect methods is the planar linked segment model (LSM) proposed by Chaffin in 1969 and still currently used for the analysis of static symmetric lifting activities [3]. Assuming that the forces of the anatomical structures crossing the joint can be reduced to one moment and one resultant force acting at the joint center, intersegmental forces and moments are calculated at each joint of the chain to the intervertebral disc center of interest (L5/S1). Shear and compressive forces are, computed as the components along the S1 vertebra-fixed reference frame of the intersegmental force acting on the intervertebral disc center plus the contribution of the back extensor muscle force

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.