AN EMPIRICAL TAKE ON THE “PLUCKING” MODEL

Abstract

Traditional estimates of potential output based on the symmetric business cycle (boom–bust) view are prone to large retrospective revisions. The plucking view, which is supported by empirics, offers possible respite. Serious attempts to estimate the output ceiling in the plucking view, analogous to potential output in the traditional view, are scarce. This paper has three parts. The first estimates the output ceiling in a computationally simple approach. The second analyzes the relationship of the resultant output gap with inflation and with the unemployment rate. A comparison is made against output gap estimates based on prevailing methods. The third uses a vector autoregression (VAR) to analyze responses to supply and demand shocks. The paper finds that the plucking model offers three points of improvement over prevailing methods based on the boom–bust view. First, boom–bust estimates are prone to large retrospective revisions when two-sided filters are used, while the plucking estimates are not. Second, output gap estimates from both views do not correlate well with core inflation. This absence of evidence for a Phillips curve is problematic for the boom–bust view. The plucking estimates correlated well with the unemployment rate but the boom–bust estimates did not. Third, the output ceiling from the plucking model responded only to supply (oil price) shocks and not demand (interest rate) shocks, hence fits the description of a supply measure. This paper provides a template to estimate the output ceiling of the plucking model in other countries using publicly available macroeconomic data.