Abstract

This study aimed to explore the characteristics and rationality of ranking offensive and defensive abilities of 32 college football teams and their division into tiers, as well as the application effects in teaching and training experiments. A combination of literature review, questionnaire survey, TOPSIS method, RSR method, and experimental method were primarily employed. The objective was to furnish a more extensive theoretical reference basis for future college football team training. The findings revealed that the TOPSIS-RSR method was capable of assessing each team's outcomes objectively and quantitatively. However, potential errors were identified in the evaluation process stemming from the final match results, necessitating multifaceted considerations between teams and players. Numerous internal and external uncertain factors, such as time, individuals, and coaches, were acknowledged. The application of the TOPSIS-RSR comprehensive evaluation method to football training technology was found to assist college students with specific football skills in enhancing their technical proficiency. It was concluded that for athletes with variable factors such as age, athlete level, and training years at different phases, the rational arrangement of training cycles must be thoroughly considered.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call