Abstract

Cell nuclei segmentation is a challenging task, especially in real applications, when the target images significantly differ between them. This task is also challenging for methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have recently boosted the performance of cell nuclei segmentation systems. However, when training data are scarce or not representative of deployment scenarios, they may suffer from overfitting to a different extent, and may hardly generalise to images that differ from the ones used for training. In this work, we focus on real-world, challenging application scenarios when no annotated images from a given dataset are available, or when few images (even unlabelled) of the same domain are available to perform domain adaptation. To simulate this scenario, we performed extensive cross-dataset experiments on several CNN-based state-of-the-art cell nuclei segmentation methods. Our results show that some of the existing CNN-based approaches are capable of generalising to target images which resemble the ones used for training. In contrast, their effectiveness considerably degrades when target and source significantly differ in colours and scale.

Highlights

  • Cell nuclei segmentation from stained tissue specimens is a useful computer vision functionality in histopathological image analysis [1,2]

  • Even if some nuclei segmentation methods can achieve relatively good performances in cross-dataset scenarios when the target images are similar to the ones used for training, much effort must be devoted to guaranteeing higher invariance in colour and scale

  • We evaluated the performances of several state-of-the-art nuclei segmentation methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), focusing on a challenging, real-world application scenario in which a laboratory information system (LIS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cell nuclei segmentation from stained tissue specimens is a useful computer vision functionality in histopathological image analysis [1,2]. Despite the considerable effort spent so far by the research community, and the performance improvements achieved by current methods based on CNNs on benchmark datasets [22,23], cell nuclei segmentation remains a challenging task [24,25,26] due to chromatic stain variability, non-homogenous background, nuclear overlap and occlusion and differences in cell morphology and stain density [2,19,27] This task is even more challenging in real applications where the specimens could belong to different tissue types.

Related Works
Open Issues and Goal of this Work
Experimental Evaluation
Nuclei Segmentation Methods
Datasets
Experimental Set-Up
Method
G Nuclei
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.