Abstract

Environmental health is very instrumental to the survival of the human race and there is the need for behavioural change for its quality. Grounded in literature is the fact that amongst all the elements of the building fabric, window is the only element which contributes holistically to Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ). However, there is no certainty that building professionals or clients consider IEQ in the selection of windows for buildings and spaces holistically. This study seeks to evaluate the various types of windows mostly used in office spaces and establish the rational for their choice. Questionnaires in the form of Google forms were developed and sent to a convenient sampled population of architects and clients in Ghana. Results shows that none of the architects or clients choice of window had a holistic rational towards achieving all the variables of IEQ - thermal comfort, lighting quality, air quality and sound quality. Most of the choices by respondents were based on at least one of the variables of IEQ as a rational. In some cases, the rational of clients had no link to IEQ. Both clients and professionals suggested modifications to current office windows for better IEQ. It is also recommended that further research is carried out to validate the findings. The relevance of this study cannot be down played as knowledge is acquired for re-engineering of appropriate and holistic window towards IEQ.

Highlights

  • The 21st century is fluxed with various organisations and institutions with the aim of solving problems of man to make life better

  • Study has shown that no window has been able to holistically achieve Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ)

  • Sliding windows which is the predominantly used needs some modifications for total IEQ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 21st century is fluxed with various organisations and institutions with the aim of solving problems of man to make life better. Life improvement is always evident in the development of the society, country or world at large. This cannot be realised if high levels of productivity are not achieved in our institutions responsible for specific task. To Chua et al (2016), “the physical environment comfort in a workplace is claimed to be vital as it will encourage healthier, more productive and lower absenteeism rate among employees”. Employee turnover rate is reduced as a result of high comfort levels. Companies should invest into developing high user comforts to yield better results (Feige et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.