Abstract
The objective of this paper was to comparatively evaluate different methods for obtaining cutoff scores in content and criterion-related validity settings. Cutoff score methods were compared in reference to the predictor standard error of measurement, number of correct and incorrect classification decisions obtained with each cutoff score procedure, and overall actual criterion performance of individuals passing each cutoff score. Results indicate that while the various methods do result in slightly different cutoff score values, they all fell within the standard error of measurement. In addition, although differences in cutoff values were reflected in differences in the number of correct and incorrect decisions, differences in the actual criterion performance of individuals passing each cutoff score were minimal. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for applied decision making especially in situations where criterion data are unavailable and the use of tests is based on content-related validity evidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
