Abstract
To test the appropriateness of area symbol design principles, this study examined eye fixations on maps that varied in three areas: quantitative or qualitative information, conventional or unconventional design, and chromatic or achromatic presentation. The conventional design of associating darker symbols with greater magnitudes on quantitative maps led to shorter fixation on the map legend, and better performance on the overall map-distribution questions from a memory questionnaire given after the maps were viewed. In contrast, the convention of using pattern or hue symbols on qualitative maps resulted in longer fixation on the map body, and poor performance on the overall map-distribution questions. Some evidence of sex difference was also reported.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.