Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the impact of public borrowing on economic growth in Nigeria using time series data from 1980 to 2018. Specifically, the study seeks to analyze the effect of domestic debt (proxy by Federal Government Bonds-FGB) and external debt (proxy by International Monetary Fund Loan-IMFL) on Nigerian’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). To achieve this objective, secondary data was collected from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical bulleting and the Debt Management Office of Nigeria. A multiple regression model involving the dependent variable (GDP) and the independent variables (FGB and IMFL) was formulated and subjected to econometric analysis. These variables were adjusted with the Jarque-bera test of normality while the correlation result was used to check the possibility of multi-collinearity among the variables. The t-test was used to answer the research questions and test the formulated hypotheses at the 5percent statistical level. Results from the analysis show that a positive relationship exists between IMF Loan and Nigeria’s gross domestic product, while a negative relationship exists between FG Bonds and Nigeria’s gross domestic product, which violates the Keynesian theory of public debt. The study concludes that both domestic and external debt significantly affect economic growth in Nigeria. Therefore, it was recommended that public borrowing should be efficiently used and contracted solely for economic reasons and not for social or political reasons as this will help to avoid accumulation of debt stock over time.

Highlights

  • IntroductionEquity Investment schemes provides fresh capital to generally small and young companies

  • The analysis revealed that, 89% of the sample size agreed that, resource mobilisation capacity as an indicator of strategic entrepreneurship management can help achieve zero wastage level in operational process

  • Analysis revealed that 95% of the sample size agreed that, resource mobilisation capacity as an indicator of strategic entrepreneurship management can help maintain a minimum level of operational and overhead costs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Equity Investment schemes provides fresh capital to generally small and young companies. Venture capital accepts more risk than banks offering loans: creditors are expected to be paid before owners in case of company's failure. Equity investment (Venture capital) can be supplied in a number of ways including public or regional organisations, banks, corporations and their affiliates. The main difference is that venture capital firms, being large pools of capital, can contribute very large amount of finance for business development. Depending on their investment strategy, they may invest in various industry sectors, or various geographical locations, or various stages of a company’s life

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call