Abstract

In this article, I argue that a new regulatory framework for controlling mobility is emerging globally. To illustrate this, I consider the case of the Italy—Libya agreement on migration control. I argue that the practices of border externalisation exemplified by this case can be understood as a form of regulatory regionalism—the spatial transformation of the state through the incorporation of forms of loose regional governance. While these new forms of governance have been critiqued widely for their negative impact on the protection of human rights and the right of asylum, their implication for a general normative theory of migration remain under-theorised. The article begins to address the new normative questions raised by these governance frameworks by discussing the right of exit. I argue that the changed political practice of border control alters the responsibility of states in this context.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.