Abstract

ABSTRACTDose planning of prostate cancer is a complex and time-consuming process. Usually, oncologists use past experience and spend a large amount of time to determine the optimal combination of dose in phase I and II of treatment. In this article, a novel TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) case-based reasoning (CBR) approach is proposed to capture the past experience and expertise of oncologists. Initially, cases that resemble new case are extracted from database. Thereafter, inferred cases are evaluated using TOPSIS, a multi-criteria decision-making approach to prescribe an optimal dose plan. Robustness of the proposed method is validated on data sets collected from the City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS, UK, using leave-one-out strategy. In experiment, the proposed methodology outperformed CBR approach. It also endorses the suitability of multi-criteria decision-making approach. This method will help oncologists to make a better trade-off between similarity measures, success rate and side effects of treatment. The methodology is generic in nature and can help oncologists both new and experienced in dose planning process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.