An efficient, amine-specific iTRAQ labeling method improves the peptide and protein identification rates

Abstract

Isotope tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) are among the most widely used proteomics quantification techniques. These tags can be rapidly coupled to the primary amines of proteins/peptides through chemical reactions under mild conditions, making this technique universally applicable to any kind of sample. However, iTRAQ reagents also partially react with the hydroxyl groups of serine, threonine and tyrosine residues, particularly when these residues coexist with a histidine residue in the same peptide. This overlabeling of peptides causes systematic biases and significantly compromises protein/peptide identification rates. In this study, we report a novel iTRAQ labeling method that overcomes the detrimental overlabeling while providing high amine labeling efficiency. The impacts of reaction temperature, reactant concentrations, reaction time, buffer compositions, and pH on iTRAQ labeling performance were investigated in-depth. In a comparison experiment between our method and the standard labeling method provided by the iTRAQ manufacturer, our method reduced the number of overlabeled peptides by 55-fold while achieving comparable amine labeling efficiency. This improvement allowed our method to eliminates the systematic bias against histidyl- and hydroxyl-containing peptides, and more importantly, enabled the identification of 23.9% more peptides and 9.8% more proteins. SignificanceIn addition to amines, the hydroxyl groups in serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues can also partially labeled by iTRAQ reagents, which leads to systematic biases and significantly compromises the analytical sensitivity. To address this issue, we developed a novel iTRAQ labeling method that overcomes the detrimental overlabeling while providing high labeling efficiency of amines. When benchmarking our method against the standard method provided by the reagent manufacturer, our method achieved comparable labeling efficiency but reduced the overlabeled species by 55-fold. This significant improvement eliminated the systematic biases, and more importantly, enabled the identification of 23.9% more peptides and 9.8% more proteins, demonstrating its superior performance and potential to enhance proteome quantification using iTRAQ labeling.