Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is a common type of complex treatment especially in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By contrast, only few rehabilitation centres in the Czech Republic provide pulmonary rehabilitation programme to non-COPD patients. OBJECTIVE: To find out if the rehabilitation programme has a similar effect in patient with obstructive and restrictive ventilatory disorder. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with either COPD or pulmonary sarcoidosis (PS) have been enrolled for the 6-week rehabilitation programme. Lung functions, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) mouth pressures, chest expansion at the level of the 4th intercostal space (IC) and at the level of the xiphoid process (XP), sixminute walk test, health-related quality of life using the St. George's Questionnaire (SGRQ) and fatigue occurrence using the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue scale (MAF) were tested at the baseline and after 6 weeks. The rehabilitation programme consisted of exercise training, ventilatory muscle training, respiratory physiotherapy and soft-tissue techniques. RESULTS: Patients with COPD improved significantly (p < .05) in MIP by 17% (10.5 cm H_2O), MEP by 18% (16.8 cm H2O), IC by 65% (1.7 cm), XP by 90% (1.9 cm), six-minute walk distance (6MWD) by 15% (64.1 m) and SGRQ by -28% (-12.3 points). Patients with PS improved significantly (p < .05) in MIP by 25% (20.1 cm H_2O), IC by 29% (1.3 cm), XP by 29% (1.3 cm) and 6MWD by 6% (31.6 m). The change in lung functions and MAF in both groups; MEP and SGRQ in PS group were insignificant after the 6-week rehabilitation programme. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-week rehabilitation programme produces similar responses in functional health status of patients with either obstructive or restrictive ventilatory disorder. However, patients with restrictive ventilatory disorder in particular should be encouraged to continue in the programme to enhance the health-related quality of life, which might not be sufficiently affected after 6 weeks.

Highlights

  • Chronic respiratory disease is mostly represented by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is often presented with respiratory symptoms like dyspnoea, cough and chest pain; and systemic symptoms like inflammation, cardiovascular disorder, muscle dysfunction, fatigue, depression and weight loss

  • The 6MWD increased by 15% (64.1 m; p = .012) and exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which is 54 m for COPD patients (Clini & Crisafulli, 2009)

  • The MCID for St. George’s Questionnaire (SGRQ), which is represented by a change of more than 4.0 points (Jones, 2005), was exceeded in all domains of the questionnaire in COPD patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chronic respiratory disease is mostly represented by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is often presented with respiratory symptoms like dyspnoea, cough and chest pain; and systemic symptoms like inflammation, cardiovascular disorder, muscle dysfunction, fatigue, depression and weight loss. Pulmonary rehabilitation is highly recommended in such patients to enhance the functional health status and quality of life (Ries et al, 2007). OBJECTIVE: To find out if the rehabilitation programme has a similar effect in patient with obstructive and restrictive ventilatory disorder. Maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) mouth pressures, chest expansion at the level of the 4th intercostal space (IC) and at the level of the xiphoid process (XP), sixminute walk test, health-related quality of life using the St. George’s Questionnaire (SGRQ) and fatigue occurrence using the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue scale (MAF) were tested at the baseline and after 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-week rehabilitation programme produces similar responses in functional health status of patients with either obstructive or restrictive ventilatory disorder. Patients with restrictive ventilatory disorder in particular should be encouraged to continue in the programme to enhance the health-related quality of life, which might not be sufficiently affected after 6 weeks

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.