Abstract

In deregulated electricity markets, reactive power provision is one of the most important ancillary services which is vital for reliable and secure operation of the system. In all electricity markets, economic issues play an important role in market scheduling. This paper presents an algorithm to find optimal reactive power market schedule. The proposed algorithm seeks to minimize a novel three-component payment function which precisely considers economic issues in the market. Two first parts of this function are reactive power provision cost and transmission loss payment. Moreover, another important part of this payment function, which has not considered in the time of reactive power market clearing in literature, is transmission charge payment. As it is shown in simulation results, this term of the function can importantly impact on final reactive power market schedule and consequently on total market payment and final market schedule. Furthermore, due to significant impact of reactive power on system voltage stability, the algorithm tries to schedule reactive power market with an adequate voltage security margin. Sequential quadratic programming is employed to clear the algorithm which is a nonlinear constrained optimization problem. The proposed algorithm is applied on IEEE-24 bus test system with satisfactory results.

Highlights

  • Since the past few decades, many electric industries around the globe have restructured

  • To guarantee the power system stability as a vital issue during market operation, the proposed algorithm seeks to find the best schedule with the adequate voltage security margin

  • Beside economic aspect of market clearing, the system operator should consider the significant impact of reactive power on the system voltage stability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the past few decades, many electric industries around the globe have restructured. In almost all electricity markets, the system operators try provide adequate reactive power with the minimum payment considering system constraints. If the system operator only considers economic aspect of reactive power market, it will result in a market schedule with the minimum market payment. This operating point may move the system toward voltage instability points. Because of the impact of reactive power schedule on power flow in transmission lines, transmission loss cost and transmission charge payment are two other parts of the three-component objective function. To guarantee the power system stability as a vital issue during market operation, the proposed algorithm seeks to find the best schedule with the adequate voltage security margin. The algorithm is applied on IEEE 24-bus test system with suitable results

Cost of reactive power provided by market participants
Cost of generator’s reactive power
Cost of condenser’s reactive power
Cost of capacitor’s reactive power
Transmission loss cost
Transmission charge payment
Voltage stability assessment
Economic issues
Technical issues
Case study
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call