An economic analysis of immediate delivery and expectant monitoring in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, between 34 and 37weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II).

Abstract

To assess the economic consequences of immediate delivery compared with expectant monitoring in women with preterm non-severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (HYPITAT-II). Obstetric departments of seven academic hospitals and 44 non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Women diagnosed with non-severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 340/7 and 370/7 weeks of gestation, randomly allocated to either immediate delivery or expectant monitoring. A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a healthcare perspective until final maternal and neonatal discharge. Health outcomes were expressed as the prevalence of respiratory distress syndrome, defined as the need for supplemental oxygen for >24hours combined with radiographic findings typical for respiratory distress syndrome. Costs were estimated from a healthcare perspective until maternal and neonatal discharge. The average costs of immediate delivery (n=352) were €10245 versus €9563 for expectant monitoring (n=351), with an average difference of €682 (95% confidence interval, 95%CI -€618 to €2126). This 7% difference predominantly originated from the neonatal admissions, which were €5672 in the immediate delivery arm and €3929 in the expectant monitoring arm. In women with mild hypertensive disorders between 340/7 and 370/7 weeks of gestation, immediate delivery is more costly than expectant monitoring as a result of differences in neonatal admissions. These findings support expectant monitoring, as the clinical outcomes of the trial demonstrated that expectant monitoring reduced respiratory distress syndrome for a slightly increased risk of maternal complications. Expectant management in preterm hypertensive disorders is less costly compared with immediate delivery.