Abstract
Presently, alternative agri-food networks are in a renaissance, utilizing an economy of proximity to compete against transnational agri-business and food distributors. While this is positive ecologically and socioeconomically, the overreliance on market mechanisms in short food chains has led to class distinctions in food distribution and consumption. The result has been a capitalist consumer paradox exacerbating inequality in the alternative agri-food networks. To resolve this inequality, we focused on how public policy can leverage state investment in public markets to reduce or overcome the capitalist consumer paradox in short food chains. To clarify our argument, we began by examining the benefits of short food chains in the urban food system. Then, we explained how type of consumption and policy regime effect food access. After this, we utilized Mexico City and New York City’s public market systems as representative of an alternative policy regime and the effects of moving away from state-oriented development. We concluded by describing possible conflicts and complements to the integration of public markets into short urban food chains.
Highlights
A principal policy goal aims to increase access to nutritious and locally-sourced food through community and economic development, leveraging territorial identity and proximity
To overcome the capitalist consumer paradox, and to meet the sustainable food system’s “for all” qualifying condition, we argue for an eco-egalitarian policy integrating short food chains (SFC) with a public market system (PMS; Pensado and Smolski [14])
Understanding how important policy implementation is to outcomes, we concluded with a discussion of the conflicts and complements that could arise from an urban public policy seeking to integrate SFC and PMS
Summary
A principal policy goal aims to increase access to nutritious and locally-sourced food through community and economic development, leveraging territorial identity and proximity. To overcome the capitalist consumer paradox, and to meet the sustainable food system’s “for all” qualifying condition, we argue for an eco-egalitarian policy integrating SFC with a public market system (PMS; Pensado and Smolski [14]). Understanding how important policy implementation is to outcomes, we concluded with a discussion of the conflicts and complements that could arise from an urban public policy seeking to integrate SFC and PMS markets in alternative agri-food networks. While this historical case method makes generalizability unachievable, it does make a strong argument for further research on this integration, an agenda we outline in the conclusion
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
