Abstract
Valid and reliable measurement methods are the basic requirements that enable the measurement and evaluation process to reach education's basic goals. Usually, using laboratory-based tools and methods for measuring the physical fitness of students is not possible within school settings. Therefore, field-based tests provide crucial solutions to physical education teachers to measure both the physical fitness of school-aged students and the athletic competence of a school’s athletes. This study aims to identify the differences in physical-fitness levels between student athletes and non-athletes and determine the effectiveness of the Assessing Levels of Physical Activity (ALPHA) test battery in discrimination between these groups. Sixty-eight healthy male students (34 athletes and 34 non-athletes) participated in this study. As a major indicator of physical fitness in student athletes and non-athletes, the body mass index for assigned study groups was controlled. After a familiarization training, participants completed three test sessions in 48-hour intervals. The 20-m progressive shuttle run test for cardiorespiratory fitness, handgrip strength test and standing broad jump test for musculoskeletal fitness, and the 4 × 10-m shuttle run test for motor fitness were used to measure the fitness levels of the groups. A t-test was used to determine the differences between athletes and non-athletes, and effect sizes were calculated to assess practical importance. Additionally, a discriminant function analysis was used to determine whether the ALPHA test battery could differentiate between athletes and non-athletes. The findings indicated that student athletes presented with significantly greater levels of fitness than non-athletes. Additionally, when the effect of body mass index was eliminated, student athletes and non-athletes were classified correctly at a rate of 70.6% using these tests. Therefore, this study shows that physical education teachers can use the ALPHA test battery to monitor athletic performance and identify talented students.
Highlights
Measurement and evaluation are the major concepts used in education to monitor the learning progress of students and to assess the final learning outcomes (Adom, Mensah, & Dake, 2020; Myers, Lee, & Silverman, 2019; Rink, 2013)
Athletes were significantly had higher values in 20m CF test laps, VO2max, Standing broad jump (SBJ), handgrip strength (HGS), and 4x10m MF test compared with the non-athletes
A regular screening of the fitness status of children and the adolescent population as a preventative measure against metabolic disorders and their health consequences is a priority for public-health initiatives (Bianco et al, 2015; Gençoğlu & Akkuş, 2020; World Health Organization (WHO), 2010)
Summary
Measurement and evaluation are the major concepts used in education to monitor the learning progress of students and to assess the final learning outcomes (Adom, Mensah, & Dake, 2020; Myers, Lee, & Silverman, 2019; Rink, 2013). Valid and reliable measurement methods are the basic requirements that enable the measurement and evaluation process to reach education's basic goals. Süleyman Ulupınar, PhD, Ermenek Uysal-Hasan Kalan Fen Lisesi, Ministry of Education, Ermenek District National Education Directorate, Karaman, Turkey. An easy-to-apply series of field test for physical education teachers in an educational setting: ALPHA test battery. Özbay / Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 262-271
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.