Abstract

The precondition of well testing interpretation is to determine the appropriate well testing model. In numerous attempts in the past, automatic classification and identification of well testing plots have been limited to fully connected neural networks (FCNN). Compared with FCNN, the convolutional neural network (CNN) has a better performance in the domain of image recognition. Utilizing the newly proposed CNN, we develop a new automatic identification approach to evaluate the type of well testing curves. The field data in tight reservoirs such as the Ordos Basin exhibit various well test models. With those models, the corresponding well test curves are chosen as training samples. One-hot encoding, Xavier normal initialization, regularization technique, and Adam algorithm are combined to optimize the established model. The evaluation results show that the CNN has a better result when the ReLU function is used. For the learning rate and dropout rate, the optimized values respectively are 0.005 and 0.4. Meanwhile, when the number of training samples was greater than 2000, the performance of the established CNN tended to be stable. Compared with the FCNN of similar structure, the CNN is more suitable for classification of well testing plots. What is more, the practical application shows that the CNN can successfully classify 21 of the 25 cases.

Highlights

  • Well testing generally has two major categories: Transient rate analysis and transient pressure analysis

  • Since the different forms of pressure derivative curves represent various reservoir types, flow regimes, and outer boundary properties, in this paper, an automatic classification method of well testing curves is proposed based on convolutional neural network (CNN)

  • During the training process of the fully connected neural networks (FCNN) and CNN, the maximum value of the output corresponded to the type of curves being predicted, which was recorded as ŷ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Well testing generally has two major categories: Transient rate analysis and transient pressure analysis. Van Everdingen and Hurst [2] used the Laplace integral method to obtain the analytical solution of the transient diffusion equation, which gives the mathematical theoretical basis of well testing Based on this truth, Horner et al [3] developed a classic “semi-log” analysis method, which can determine the permeability, skin factor, productivity index, and other parameters. Since the different forms of pressure derivative curves represent various reservoir types, flow regimes, and outer boundary properties, in this paper, an automatic classification method of well testing curves is proposed based on CNN. By summarizing the buildup test data in low permeability reservoirs, the vertically fractured well model, dual-porosity model, and radial composite model were selected as the base model, which were used to generate 2500 theoretical curves of five different types. Ordos Basin were used to verify the generalization ability of the CNN noted above

Background
Concept of CNN
Schematic
Sample Obtaining
Structure of Neural Network Model
Evaluation Results for the CNN and FCNN
One-Hot Encoding
Determination of Model Initialization
Selection
Regularization
Comparison of Classification Performance for FCNN and CNN
0.69. Appendix
Effect
Effect of the Number of Training Samples
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call