Abstract

The recent trend of automated machine learning (AutoML) has been driving further significant technological innovation in the application of artificial intelligence from its automated algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization of the deployable pipeline model for unraveling substance problems. However, a current knowledge gap lies in the integration of AutoML technology and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) within image-based data classification tasks. Therefore, we employed a state-of-the-art (SOTA) and completely open-source AutoML framework, Auto-sklearn, which was constructed based on one of the most widely used ML systems: Scikit-learn. It was combined with two novel AutoML visualization tools to focus particularly on the recognition and adoption of UAS-derived multispectral vegetation indices (VI) data across a diverse range of agricultural management practices (AMP). These include soil tillage methods (STM), cultivation methods (CM), and manure application (MA), and are under the four-crop combination fields (i.e., red clover-grass mixture, spring wheat, pea-oat mixture, and spring barley). Furthermore, they have currently not been efficiently examined and accessible parameters in UAS applications are absent for them. We conducted the comparison of AutoML performance using three other common machine learning classifiers, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN). The results showed AutoML achieved the highest overall classification accuracy numbers after 1200 s of calculation. RF yielded the second-best classification accuracy, and SVM and ANN were revealed to be less capable among some of the given datasets. Regarding the classification of AMPs, the best recognized period for data capture occurred in the crop vegetative growth stage (in May). The results demonstrated that CM yielded the best performance in terms of classification, followed by MA and STM. Our framework presents new insights into plant–environment interactions with capable classification capabilities. It further illustrated the automatic system would become an important tool in furthering the understanding for future sustainable smart farming and field-based crop phenotyping research across a diverse range of agricultural environmental assessment and management applications.

Highlights

  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are considered one of the most significant technologies for the further development of precision agriculture (PA) [1] and sustainable smart farming [2]

  • Our results showed that automated machine learning (AutoML) computations within 60-s-run produced between 11 and 12 pipelines (Figure 7), which might offer a beneficial foundation for providing adequate outcomes in most cases with minimal attempts and time

  • The scientific merit of this article lay in utilizing artificial intelligence to replace the judgment of the human for UAS classification analysis with its automated data pre-processing, model selection, feature engineering, and hyperparameter optimization capabilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are considered one of the most significant technologies for the further development of precision agriculture (PA) [1] and sustainable smart farming [2]. UAS are frequently employed for the surveillance of cultivated lands, providing effective solutions for accurate decision support, increasing farming efficiency, enhancing profitability, reducing environmental impacts, and driving further technological innovation [1,3,4]. UAS equipped with various novel sensor types can be exploited to improve agreement and synergy between imagery and field reference data. These systems can identify the regional monitoring requirements, such as disease detection, growth observation, yield estimation, and weed management [5,6]. In PA, vegetation indices (VI) are one of the most widely used outputs from UAS imagery applications and assist in the delivery of dependable spatial and temporal information across multiple agricultural activities. The outputs and findings collected from controlled environments can be difficult to extrapolate onto field settings and can impair the interpretation and application of research schemes [10]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.