Abstract

Moderate spatial resolution satellite data from the Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A MSI sensors together offer 10 m to 30 m multi-spectral reflective wavelength global coverage, providing the opportunity for improved combined sensor mapping and monitoring of the Earth’s surface. However, the standard geolocated Landsat-8 OLI L1T and Sentinel-2A MSI L1C data products are currently found to be misaligned. An approach for automated registration of Landsat-8 OLI L1T and Sentinel-2A MSI L1C data is presented and demonstrated using contemporaneous sensor data. The approach is computationally efficient because it implements feature point detection across four image pyramid levels to identify a sparse set of tie-points. Area-based least squares matching around the feature points with mismatch detection across the image pyramid levels is undertaken to provide reliable tie-points. The approach was assessed by examination of extracted tie-point spatial distributions and tie-point mapping transformations (translation, affine and second order polynomial), dense-matching prediction-error assessment, and by visual registration assessment. Two test sites over Cape Town and Limpopo province in South Africa that contained cloud and shadows were selected. A Landsat-8 L1T image and two Sentinel-2A L1C images sensed 16 and 26 days later were registered (Cape Town) to examine the robustness of the algorithm to surface, atmosphere and cloud changes, in addition to the registration of a Landsat-8 L1T and Sentinel-2A L1C image pair sensed 4 days apart (Limpopo province). The automatically extracted tie-points revealed sensor misregistration greater than one 30 m Landsat-8 pixel dimension for the two Cape Town image pairs, and greater than one 10 m Sentinel-2A pixel dimension for the Limpopo image pair. Transformation fitting assessments showed that the misregistration can be effectively characterized by an affine transformation. Hundreds of automatically located tie-points were extracted and had affine-transformation root-mean-square error fits of approximately 0.3 pixels at 10 m resolution and dense-matching prediction errors of similar magnitude. These results and visual assessment of the affine transformed data indicate that the methodology provides sub-pixel registration performance required for meaningful Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A MSI data comparison and combined data applications.

Highlights

  • Moderate spatial resolution satellite data from the similar polar-orbiting sun-synchronousLandsat-8 and Sentinel-2 sensors together provide the opportunity for improved mapping and Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 520; doi:10.3390/rs8060520 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensingRemote Sens. 2016, 8, 520 monitoring of the Earth’s surface [1]

  • After the depth-first mismatch detection process, a total of 116 tie-points were defined between the Landsat-8 week 47 and the Sentinel-2A week 49 image pair, and 797 tie-points were defined between the Landsat-8 week 47 and Sentinel-2A week 51 image pair

  • This study presented an approach for the automated registration of geolocated Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Moderate spatial resolution satellite data from the similar polar-orbiting sun-synchronousLandsat-8 and Sentinel-2 sensors together provide the opportunity for improved mapping and Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 520; doi:10.3390/rs8060520 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensingRemote Sens. 2016, 8, 520 monitoring of the Earth’s surface [1]. Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 sensors together provide the opportunity for improved mapping and Remote Sens. Landsat-8 carries the Operational Land Imager (OLI) and the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) that sense 11 spectral bands including eight 30 m reflective wavelength bands, one 15 m panchromatic band, and two 100 m thermal wavelength bands [2]. The Landsat-8 swath is approximately 185 km (15 ̋ field of view from an altitude of 705 km) and provides a global coverage of the Earth’s surface every 16 days [2]. The Sentinel-2A swath is approximately 290 km The Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 sensors will provide 10 m to 30 m multi-spectral reflective wavelength global coverage approximately every 3 days

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call