Abstract

Natural rates of soil production or a target soil thickness that allows unrestricted land use can serve as a basis for defining tolerable soil erosion rates. Guidelines for tolerable soil erosion rates in alpine grasslands do not yet exist, partly due to the lack of information of soil formation and production rates. We (i) defined soil formation/production rates for alpine grasslands on siliceous lithology and compared them to measured and modelled soil erosion rates and resulting soil thickness with a special focus on the Urseren Valley (Central Swiss Alps) and (ii) discussed possible trends for alpine soils under global change. Ranges of soil formation, production and erosion rates were determined using published and our own data for Alpine grasslands soils. Two definitions of tolerable erosion rate were used: when (i) current soil depth remains constant over time; and (ii) at least a minimum soil depth is maintained (minimum thicknesses for individual land uses still need to be defined). Soil production and related tolerable erosion rates (i.e. 50–90 % of the soil production rate) are a strong function of time. Average soil production rate in alpine areas for relatively old soils (>10–18 kyr) is between 54 (±14) and 113 (±30) t km−2 year−1, for young soils (>1–10 kyr) between 119 (±44) and 248 (±91) t km−2 year−1 and for very young soils (≤1 kyr) between 415 (±242) and 881 (±520) t km−2 year−1. Measured recent soil erosion rates in alpine areas at intensively used slopes range from 600 to 3000 t km−2 year−1. Average catchment values for the Urseren Valley using the model USLE plus soil loss due to landslides resulted in an overall loss of 180 t km−2 year−1, which considerably exceeds production rates of the soils. The comparison of soil production and erosion rates indicated unsustainable management of grassland soils in the Urseren Valley. Other Alpine regions report similar or even higher erosion rates. Consequently, attention has to be paid to Alpine grasslands used for agricultural purposes because today’s soil erosion rates often considerably exceed soil formation, thus resulting in very shallow soils. Future global change is likely to increase soil erosion rates even further.

Highlights

  • Alpine soils are an often overlooked and undervalued resource

  • Soil degradation in Alpine grasslands is mostly due to three processes: (i) shallow landslide activity, which is a mass movement of soil volume; (ii) sheet erosion, which is a gradual detachment and transport of single soil grains and aggregates and (iii) livestock trails caused by trampling of cattle or sheep, which give rise to horizontal structures (Fig. 1)

  • Physical soil erosion (E) is defined as detachment and transport of soil material, which is, in Alpine grasslands, mostly due to three processes: (i) shallow landslide activity which is a mass movement of soil volume; (ii) sheet erosion, which is a gradual detachment and transport of single soil grains and aggregates and (iii) livestock trails (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

The comparison of soil production and erosion rates indicated unsustainable management of grassland soils in the Urseren Valley. Other Alpine regions report similar or even higher erosion rates. Attention has to be paid to Alpine grasslands used for agricultural purposes because today’s soil erosion rates often considerably exceed soil formation, resulting in very shallow soils. Future global change is likely to increase soil erosion rates even further

Introduction
Site description
Soil production and formation
Soil erosion
Error estimation and statistics
Results and discussion
Soil formation and production in Alpine grasslands
Tolerable soil erosion rates
Soil sediment budgets indicate unsustainable management
An attempt to assess future development of soil sediment budgets
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call