Abstract

This paper discusses rapid flow and stage fluctuations in a large lowland river downstream from a large hydropower plant (HPP) in Lithuania. The main problem arises when the HPP is operating in peak mode. Such operation of HPP causes rapid flow and stage fluctuations, which can have a certain impact on river ecosystems. The study analyzes general abiotic indicators such as upramping and downramping rates and stage fluctuations downstream of the HPP. The main idea was to assess recorded stage upramping and downramping rates along the river downstream of large HPP. To assess stage fluctuation statistics, COSH software was used. A maximum upramping rate of 1.04 m/h and maximum downramping rate of 0.88 m/h were identified using data from temporary and permanent gauging stations. Obtained results revealed that stage fluctuations exceed ecologically acceptable rates up to 20 km downstream of HPP. The effect of hydropeaking fades out only at a chainage of 45 km downstream of HPP. In mountainous regions, ecologically acceptable rates are reached at much smaller distances. The study shows that the traditional coefficient of variation of stage fluctuation data can be used to describe hydropeaking indicators. The main results of this study can be used for environmental impact assessment downstream from HPPs.

Highlights

  • Hydropower is the leader in the renewable energy sector, accounting for 71% of energy generated from renewable energy sources, and 16.4% of all electricity produced globally came from hydropower in 2016 [1]

  • Hydropeaking, which is caused by operating regimes of the hydropower plant (HPP), is characterized as rapid changes

  • It is essential to take into account river morphometry and the shape of the river channel

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydropower is the leader in the renewable energy sector, accounting for 71% of energy generated from renewable energy sources, and 16.4% of all electricity produced globally came from hydropower in 2016 [1]. Latvia is a small lowland country, situated near the Baltic Sea, and some 70% of its electricity is generated from hydropower [2]. Its neighboring country Lithuania generates a significantly smaller amount of energy from hydropower, only 9%, even though the countries have very similar topographic and climatic conditions. European lowland regions such as Estonia, Belarus, and Poland. The contribution from hydropower to the power generation mix in these countries is rather low

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.