Abstract
This work aims to present a comparison of 4 (four) analysis methodologies of the fire risks in historical sites. These analysis methodologies are the following: Ebrafire, Chichorro, Gretener and Multi-criteria. The Town area under study is bordered by Tiradentes Square, Senador Rocha Lagoa Street, Conêgo Camilo Veloso bystreet and Cônego de Bobadela Street in the historic center of Ouro Preto. The comparative analysis among the four methodologies presented discrepancies in the degrees of fire hazards. However the block assessed presents a high risk of fire, since the great majority of buildings in the area received insufficient fire safety results. Therefore, although the results here are not conclusive, since this research is in the initial phase, it is already possible to verify the urgency of mitigation actions to reduce the risk of fire in most buildings in the evaluated block.
Highlights
Risk and Disaster Management (DRM) works with five phases: preparation, mitigation, prevention, responseAccording to the normative instruction number 01 dated August 24, 2012 of the Ministry of National Integration (Brazil), “disaster is a result of an and recovery
The Sendai Framework (ALVES, 2016) recommends risk management based on four action priorities: adverse event, natural or man-made, under a vulnerable ecosystem, using human material of environmental damage in addition to economic and social damage” (Brazil 2012), and they can be classified, as to primary cause in:
Natural: Arising from natural process or natural phenomena that may result in human losses or other impacts on health, damage to the environment, property, interruption of services and Priority 1: Understanding disaster risk; Priority 2: Strengthening governance to manage disaster risk; Priority 3: Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience; Priority 4: Improve preparedness to respond effectively and rebuild better recovery, rehabilitation and reconstrucion
Summary
Risk and Disaster Management (DRM) works with five phases: preparation, mitigation, prevention, response. The Sendai Framework (ALVES, 2016) recommends risk management based on four action priorities: adverse event, natural or man-made, under a vulnerable ecosystem, using human material of environmental damage in addition to economic and social damage” (Brazil 2012), and they can be classified, as to primary cause in:. Essential assistance to victims (COYLE AND MEIER, 2009) New technologies and their uses allow to improve. Based on geographical information and technology according to the potential of the discovered gold mines, associated. Geographical data and its tools are essential in all aspects of emergency management: preparation, response, recovery and mitigation. According to Serpa (2009), some aspects can increase the risks of a fire, make difficult or prevent its combat and extinction, or cause the structural collapse of the building.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
