Abstract

Accurate prediction of the hydrodynamic profile is important for circulating fluidized bed (CFB) reactor design and scale-up. Multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation with interphase momentum exchange is key to accurately predict the gas-solid profile along the height of the riser. The present work deals with the assessment of six different drag model capability to accurately predict the riser section axial solid holdup distribution in bench scale circulating fluidized bed. The difference between six drag model predictions were validated against the experiment data. Two-dimensional geometry, transient solver and Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase models were used. Six drag model simulation predictions were discussed with respect to axial and radial profile. The comparison between CFD simulation and experimental data shows that the Syamlal-O’Brien, Gidaspow, Wen-Yu and Huilin-Gidaspow drag models were successfully able to predict the riser upper section solid holdup distribution with better accuracy, however unable to predict the solid holdup transition region. On the other hand, the Gibilaro model and Helland drag model were successfully able to predict the bottom dense region, but the upper section solid holdup distribution was overpredicted. The CFD simulation comparison of different drag model has clearly shown the limitation of the drag model to accurately predict overall axial heterogeneity with accuracy.

Highlights

  • The gas–solid fluidized bed reactors are widely used in the petrochemical, power generation, environmental and metallurgical industries [1]

  • In the circulating fluidized bed (CFB) system, solid particles are separated from the fluid stream using cyclone and recycle to the bed

  • The CFB riser section serves as the main reaction zone, in which strands of particles influence the flow and the performance of reactor [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The gas–solid fluidized bed reactors are widely used in the petrochemical, power generation, environmental and metallurgical industries [1]. To accurately simulate the riser gas-solid multiphase flow, researchers incorporated drag coefficient to account for the particle cluster. Shah et al [28] simulate fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) riser section using EMMS and the Gidaspow drag model for low and high solid circulation rate. They reported EMMS drag model successfully able to predict the riser axial heterogenous profile. Vaishali et al [29] perform CFD simulation for fast fluidization and dilute phase transport flow regime with Geldart B particles They reported that the Wen-Yu drag model underpredicts the velocity profile and Syamlal-O’Brien drag model show better prediction.

Simulation System
Result and Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
37 References
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call