Abstract

Abstract. A high rocky slope is an open complex giant system for which there is contradiction among different influencing factors and coexistence of qualitative and quantitative information. This study presents a comprehensive intelligent evaluation method of high rocky slope safety through an integrated analytic hierarchy process, extension matter element model and entropy weight to assess the safety behavior of the high rocky slope. The proposed intelligent evaluation integrates subjective judgments derived from the analytic hierarchy process with the extension matter model and entropy weight into a multiple indexes dynamic safety evaluation approach. A combined subjective and objective comprehensive evaluation process, a more objective study, through avoiding subjective effects on the weights, and a qualitative safety assessment and quantitative safety amount are presented in the proposed method. The detailed computational procedures were also provided to illustrate the integration process of the above methods. Safety analysis of one high rocky slope is conducted to illustrate that this approach can adequately handle the inherent imprecision and contradiction of the human decision-making process and provide the flexibility and robustness needed for the decision maker to better monitor the safety status of a high rocky slope. This study was the first application of the proposed integrated evaluation method in the safety assessment of a high rocky slope. The study also indicated that it can also be applied to other similar problems.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, human beings are facing many serious environmental and natural geological disasters, accompanying the massive construction of important projects (Su et al, 2013a)

  • The objective of this study is to propose a methodology for identifying and delineating high rocky slope safety using an integrated analytic hierarchy process (AHP)–matter element analysis (MEA)–entropy weight method (EWM)

  • Assessment and selection of appropriate solutions for occupational safety were classified as an multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, and EWM was used to determine the relative significance of evaluation criteria (Dejus and Antucheviciene, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human beings are facing many serious environmental and natural geological disasters, accompanying the massive construction of important projects (Su et al, 2013a). The prevailing side of the proposed method in solving the multiple criteria decision-making problem is its capability of more objective and intelligent assessment in mathematical form, combining detected influencing factors without the need of human involvement and interference. We have seen the development of the finite element analysis, the fuzzy mathematic method and the artificial neural network method They all conduct the assessment through combining qualitative and quantitative information, and the factors concerned basically do not change (Su et al, 2013b). The objective of this study is to propose a methodology for identifying and delineating high rocky slope safety using an integrated analytic hierarchy process (AHP)–matter element analysis (MEA)–entropy weight method (EWM). An example of one slope is presented to illustrate the proposed methodology

Literature review
Integrated method
Multi-level and multi-index evaluation system of high rocky slope safety
C10 C11 C12 C13
The identification of evaluation indexes’ importance on high rocky slopes
Weight determination of evaluation indexes on high rocky slope
Case study
Influencing index importance analysis
B C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call