An approach for reaching consensus in large-scale group decision-making focusing on dimension reduction

Abstract

Group decision-making and consensus modeling have always been important research topics. With the widespread use of the Internet, group decisions can be made online, in which a large number of decision-makers participate. Most of the existing studies on large-scale group decision-making consider 20–50 decision-makers. Therefore, there is a need for a framework that focuses on situations where thousands of decision-makers exist. As dimension reduction is one of the five primary challenges in large-scale group decision-making, in this study, after reviewing the existing approaches, a new model is presented using a statistical approach along with complex network analysis techniques. The opinions are generalized first, and then the network of opinions is built. This new method reduces the dimensions of the problem by considering a hierarchy of opinions. Different scenarios were designed for the evaluation. The results show that the effect of this generalization on dimension reduction depends on the parameters of the problem. We have shown that in a group decision scenario with 3000 decision-makers and 6 alternatives, 99% of the data was reduced. As dimension reduction is the main focus of the current research, the effect of consistency on the diversity of opinions has also been investigated, and the results show that opinion consistency affects opinion generalization, which in turn affects dimension reduction. In addition, in the performed simulations, three types of functions were used to calculate similarity. The aim was to determine the best similarity function for the decision problems whose purpose was to rank the available alternatives. The results show that Euclidean similarity is a strict criterion compared with Cosine similarity.