Abstract

The 2010 EPBD asks for an economic and social analysis in order to preserve social equity and to promote innovation and building productivity. This is possible with a life cycle energy cost (LCEC) analysis, such as with the SEC (Sustainable Energy Cost) model whose bottom up approach begins with a building typology including inhabitants. Then the analysis of some representative buildings includes the identification of a technico-economical optimum and energy retrofitting scenarios for each retrofitting programme and the extrapolation for the whole building stock. An extrapolation for the whole building stock allows to set up the strategy and to identify the needed means for reaching the objectives. SEC is a decision aid tool for optimising sustainable energy retrofitting strategies for buildings at territorial and patrimonial scales inside a sustainable development approach towards the factor 4. Various versions of the SEC model are now available for housing and for tertiary buildings.

Highlights

  • SEC and the life cycle energy cost (LCEC) tools are a necessary complement of energy existing tools in order to take into account economical efficiency, to preserve social equity and local jobs and to improve the building sector productivity

  • The potential level of energy savings for a building stock according to a technical point of view has to be compared with the potential level of energy savings including a social and economical analysis;

  • The French law (Grenelle 1) asks for an energy retrofitting up to 150 kWh/m2 · year and a lot of social owner manage their strategy according to this objective but for some buildings the technico-economic optimum is higher and they should manage to reach it and for others the technicoeconomic optimum is under this level and they should get subsidies for reaching this political level of energy performance;

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

The 2010 EPBD asks for an economic and social analysis in order to preserve social equity and to promote innovation and building productivity. This is possible with a life cycle energy cost (LCEC) analysis, such as with the SEC (Sustainable Energy Cost) model whose bottom up approach begins with a building typology including inhabitants. The analysis of some representative buildings includes the identification of a technico-economical optimum and energy retrofitting scenarios for each retrofitting programme and the extrapolation for the whole building stock. Esto es posible con el análisis del coste global ampliado y especialmente con el modelo SEC. Palabras clave: Coste global ampliado, estrategia de rehabilitación energética sostenible, optimo técnico-económico

The new sustainable development approach required by the EPBD
From best practices and awareness to best policies or strategies
A LCEC analysis with the SEC model
What is the SEC model?
The SEC model’s objective
The SEC model improvements
The SEC model: a decision aid tool for various actors
A dialogue tool towards building productivity and local employment
The various available versions and uses of the SEC model in 2011
The SEC model hypotheses
First step: a typology and the selection of representative buildings
The energy diagnosis of the representative buildings with the SEC model
Third step: selection of the most efficient techniques and scenarios
Towards sustainable energy retrofitting strategies
The first results in France
Regional or local authorities’ strategies
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.