Abstract
Abstract The use of Additive Manufacturing (AM) in the production of tooling for injection molding has led to the introduction of conformal cooling as an effective way to lower the cycle time of the process. As the cooling cycle is responsible for a large portion of the energy consumed during the injection molding process, conformal cooling allows increasing the energy efficiency. However, AM could create a large upfront cost of energy for the manufacturing phase. This paper investigates a case study where a cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment is used to evaluate the cumulative energy demand of conventional or conformal cooling molds.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
