Abstract

This paper deals with the use of parametric quantile regression for the calculation of a loaded premium, based on a quantile measure, corresponding to individual insurance risk. Heras et al. have recently introduced a ratemaking process based on a two-stage quantile regression model. In the first stage, a probability to have at least one claim is estimated by a GLM logit, whereas in the second stage several quantile regressions are necessary for the estimate of the severity component. The number of quantile regressions to be performed is equal to the number of risk classes selected for ratemaking. In the actuarial context, when a large number of risk classes are considered (e.g. in Motor Third Party Liability), such approach can imply an over-parameterization and time-consuming. To this aim, in the second stage, we suggest to apply a more parsimonious approach based on Parametric Quantile Regression as introduced by Frumento and Bottai and never used in the actuarial context. This more conservative approach allows you not to lose efficiency in the estimation of premiums compared to the traditional Quantile Regression.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.