Abstract

Timber diaphragms in existing buildings are often too flexible in their plane, and can thus potentially cause out-of-plane collapses of walls during earthquakes. A very efficient retrofitting method to increase their in-plane stiffness and energy dissipation is the overlay of plywood panels. However, the usual characterization of the floors by means of a general equivalent shear stiffness cannot account for their nonlinearity and dissipative properties. Therefore, in this work, an analytical model is formulated to describe the in-plane response of timber diaphragms strengthened with plywood panels screwed along their perimeter to the existing sheathing. The proposed formulation starts from the definition of the load-slip equation for a single screw connecting a plank and a plywood panel. The whole floor’s response is then derived, with the prediction of both backbone curve and pinching cycles. From the comparison between the response of tested full-scale diaphragms and the analytically calculated one, it can be concluded that the proposed model accurately predicts the in-plane behaviour and dissipative properties of timber floors retrofitted with plywood panels.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSeveral strengthening techniques have been investigated in the recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], in order to enhance the seismic properties of the existing diaphragms

  • From the comparison between the response of tested full-scale diaphragms and the analytically calculated one, it can be concluded that the proposed model accurately predicts the in-plane behaviour and dissipative properties of timber floors retrofitted with plywood panels

  • An analytical model was presented, predicting the inplane behaviour and the dissipative properties of timber diaphragms strengthened with plywood panels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several strengthening techniques have been investigated in the recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], in order to enhance the seismic properties of the existing diaphragms Among these techniques, reversible ones are often preferred because of their lower impact on the original configuration of the structure, especially when the building to be retrofitted is monu­ mental or protected [16].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call