Abstract
In this paper, we discuss and relate characterisations of different forms of ‘jumping to conclusions’: Kraus, Lehmann & Magidor's analysis of plausible reasoning, the present author's characterisation of inductive reasoning, Zadrozny's account of abductive reasoning, and Gardenfors' theory of belief revision. Our main claims are that (i) inductive reasoning can be characterised in a way similar to plausible reasoning; (ii) inductive and abductive reasoning are special cases of explanatory reasoning; and (iii) there are strong relations between belief revision and explanatory reasoning. The ultimate goal of this research is a general account of jumping to conclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
