Abstract
Many investigators have reported attempts to develop reliable laboratory and clinic evaluation systems. However, few studies, regardless of level of success, have used an analytic procedure to identify those components of the evaluation system that, if refined further, could improve reliability. This paper described the development of an evaluation system for two preclinical laboratory courses. Reliability estimates of 0.80, 0.74, and 0.68 were obtained for three different evaluation instruments used in conjunction with the evaluation system. An analytic technique for identifying components contributing to, and detracting from, the reliability of the evaluation system is also described. Further refinements based on this analysis are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
