Abstract

A persistent conjecture regarding the potential problems in the clinical use of hair assays has been that drug concentration in hair may have a racial bias. In sociocultural terms, “bias” has a negative connotation and inherently implies a value judgment. In this controversy, however, the racial bias criticism seems to be directed at what one might call a “technical bias.” In statistical use, the concept “bias” indicates a systematic departure from the random occurrence of an empirical property in any particular sample. Sociological bias becomes an issue when some consequence is attached to the empirical differentiation. Thus the “bias issue” in hair testing is a cultural one, because illegal drug use is generally considered “negative” in contemporary society and in the law. In some circumstances, the data’s statistical treatment does not lend support to either a racial or a hair color bias.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.