Abstract

ObjectivesThis paper presents an overview and comparative analysis of the epidemiological situation and the policy responses in France, Belgium, and Canada during the early stages of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic (Feb.-Aug. 2020). These three countries are compared because they represent a spectrum of different governance structures while also being OECD nations that are similar in many other respects. MethodsA rapid review of primary data from the three countries was conducted. Data was collected from official government documents whenever possible, supplemented by information from international databases and local media reports. The data was then analysed to identify common patterns as well as significant divergences across the three countries, especially in the areas of health policy and technology use. ResultsFrance, Belgium and Canada faced differing epidemiological situations during the Covid-19 pandemic, and the wide variety of policy actions taken appears to be linked to existing governance and healthcare structures. The varying degrees of federalism and regional autonomy across the three countries highlight the different constraints faced by national policy-makers within different governance models. ConclusionsThe actions taken by all three countries appear to have been largely dictated by existing health system capacity, with increasing federalism associated with more fragmented strategies and less coordination across jurisdictions. However, the implications of certain policies related to economic resilience and health system capacity cannot yet be fully evaluated and may even prove to have net negative impacts into the future.

Highlights

  • As Covid-19 continues to impact societies in multiple ways, understanding how different governance regimes addressed the challenges of this pandemic may yield lessons for policymakers who continue to manage the economic, physical, mental and behavioural health consequences of this disease using a constantly evolving evidence base

  • Belgium was the most affected by Covid-19, and policies there may have been less effective than in France of Canada

  • The largely provincial decision-making in Canada has allowed certain provinces such as British Columbia to harness strong governance capacity to swiftly tackle the pandemic, while others like Quebec have struggled to flatten the curve, perhaps due in part to a more laissez-faire approach to policy-making

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This paper presents an overview and comparative analysis of the epidemiological situation and the policy responses in France, Belgium, and Canada during the early stages of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic (Feb.-Aug. 2020). These three countries are compared because they represent a spectrum of different governance structures while being OECD nations that are similar in many other respects

Methods
Results
Conclusions
Introduction
Conclusions and policy implications
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call