Abstract
This paper applies the transaction cost framework to the analysis of the housing redevelopment process in Korea. The housing redevelopment process involves various identifiable transactions and cost-incurring hazards which originate from uncertainty about development potential and effects, interdependencies and the consequent strategic behaviours of relevant parties. Responding to the characteristics of the transactions and hazards, various forms of governance structure are institutionalised. The extant governance mechanisms fit neither perfect market nor pure hierarchy. Rather, hybrid forms of governance spanning the public and private spheres are aligned with the relevant transactions. On the other hand, a remediableness test indicates that different governance mechanisms which seem more efficient than the current ones can be identified for each stage of housing redevelopment. This finding marks a superb potential of the transaction cost approach for assessing institutional efficiency that the Pigouvian approach does not have.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.