Abstract

Malicious insider attacks affect all sectors, economies, and organizations of the world, with insider cyber-sabotage causing significant damage. Key findings from previous research on malicious insider threats underscore a need for prevention and detection programs that are broadly based. Current risk management administrative and technical mitigation techniques often include indicators of potential malicious insiders in the form of personal factors and observable behaviors. However, these need empirical validation in the context of cyber-sabotage. This article builds on previous research on insider threats and investigates the relationship between motives, behavioral indicators, and insider cyber-sabotage. We examine 74 actual cases of convicted insider threat attacks using a logistic regression model. The results confirm hypotheses that revenge (one of the motives), addiction (one of the observable behavioral indicators), and poor work performance increase the likelihood of insider sabotage. The findings provide empirical validation of cyber-sabotage specific indicators for insider threat programs. Implications and future research are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.