Abstract

AbstractDeep convolutional neural networks have achieved state of the art results in many image classification tasks. However, the large amount of parameters of the network limit its deployment to storage space limited situations. Low-rank decomposition methods are effective to compress the network, such as Canonical Polyadic decomposition and Tucker decomposition. However, most low-rank decomposition based approaches cannot achieve a satisfactory balance between the classification accuracy and compression ratio of the network. In this paper, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of Canonical Polyadic and Tucker decomposition and give a selection guidance to take full advantage of both. And we recommend to use Tucker decomposition for shallow layers and Canonical Polyadic decomposition for deep layers of a deep convolutional neural network. The experiment results show that our approach achieves the best trade-off between accuracy and parameter compression ratio, which validates our point of view.KeywordsLow-rank decompositionCanonical Polyadic decompositionTucker decompositionDeep convolutional neural networksImage classification

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.