Abstract
ABSTRACT Background The COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges to substance misuse services. Patients face a higher risk of infection and transmission to others. Services were required to reconfigure quickly in response to the government lockdown. These changes had to be completed before national guidance was published. Method To examine the strategy and operational delivery of two London boroughs and measure how convergent they were with national guidelines. Referral data were analyzed and compared to a similar time frame pre-COVID-19. Results Both services adopted similar strategies and pace of change. Longer supplies of opiate substitution therapy (OST) were prescribed, with less restrictive arrangements for collection. There was an increase in opiate assessments and a reduction in alcohol assessments. There was no overall increase in mortality. There was minor deviation from national guidance when it was initially published. Conclusions The services were well equipped to respond to the rapid changes demanded during early lockdown. Reduced restrictions in OST may not be associated with negative service or patient outcomes. The move to remote consultations and home working are likely to have value in substance misuse services after the pandemic. The long-term impact of lockdown presents uncertainties in terms of clinical safety and requires evaluation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
