Abstract
Double-function list acquisition was analyzed in three experiments which used mixed-list designs and forced-choice recognition tests. Findings showed that specific associative interference occurred both during learning and performance phases, that its source was limited to the immediate backward associate during the learning phase, but that it also involved items further removed in both the forward and backward directions during the performance phase, probably by way of mediated chaining.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have