An analysis of direct and indirect measurements of left atrial filling pressure

Abstract

Left ventricular function may be assessed by direct catheter measurements of left atrial pressure or by indirect measurements of pulmonary artery wedge pressure or pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure. Controversy exists as to how closely the indirect measurements correlate with true left atrial pressure and to which is the most accurate. To clarify this probelm, we studied 43 patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. Both left atrial catheters for direct measurement and Swan-Ganz catheters were placed at the time of surgery. All patients were monitored continuously for 48 hours and hourly measurements were recorded. The resultant 1,620 left atrial pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure figures and 1,860 left atrial pressure and pulmonary artery end-diastolic wedge pressure measurements were subjected to computer analysis. The following conclusions have been found: (1) Pulmonary artery wedge pressure is a better indirect measure of left atrial pressure than is pulmonary artery end-diastolic wedge pressure (pooled correlation coefficient 0.629); (2) direct left atrial pressure measurement is more reliable and has fewer complications than indirect measurements; (3) there is no consistent correlation between left atrial pressure and central venous pressure (pooled correlation coefficient 0.3). A discussion of our results and the problems associated with left atrial catheters and Swan-Ganz catheters is presented.