Abstract
We analysed Ball's empirical model of stomatal conductance (Ball, Woodrow and Berry, 1987). The original interpretation was found to be flawed, and a new one is proposed which views the model as a description of the relationship between CO2 flux rate and stomatal conductance, rather than as a model of stomatal conductance alone. It is shown that this model is useful for describing changes in intercellular CO2 concentration. The model was tested against data from experiments in which the responses of stomatal conductance and CO2 flux density to humidity and temperature were measured in leaves of Hedera helix. It was found that the responses to temperature and humidity are not treated in a satisfactory way in the model whereas the response of the model to other variables is realistic. An alternative to Ball's model is described and tested. It is concluded that Ball's model is a useful starting point for development of simulation models to be used as submodels in canopy and regional models. However, as any empirical model, it is of no use for defining causal relationships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
