An analysis of allegations of sexual abuse in a multi-victim day-care center case

Abstract

Sexual abuse in day-care centers is a phenomenon of increasing concern, both in terms of its prevalence and its serious effects on child victims. Legal intervention in this area is problematic because criminal investigations are usually beset with difficulties: Characteristics of children and of the abuse situation affect disclosure rates and credibility. Research on children as witnesses is amassing; however, so far, little systematic analysis has been conducted on multi-victim child sexual abuse cases. The present study concerns a case of sexual abuse in a day-care center with over 100 alleged victims. Criteria derived from Statement Validity Analysis (SVA) protocols were applied to aggregate record review data to assess the veritability of the abuse allegations. Individual children's abuse disclosures were also analyzed, vis-à-vis characteristics of the children (age, gender, recency of attendance) and of the investigation (agency doing the interview, number of interviews, use of anatomically detailed dolls). The use of SVA criteria supported the veritability of allegations in this day-care abuse case. Even acknowledging the limitations of archival data collected for other purposes, the aggregate data analysis reflected consistency, logical structure, and spontaneity; however, little evidence of accommodation was found. Multivariate comparison of disclosing and nondisclosing children found an unexpected inverse relationship of disclosure with age, as well as positive associations with number of interviews and use of dolls. Alternative interpretations of these results are discussed.