Abstract
Abstract— The time dependence of the delayed light in the green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa has been examined quantitatively in the 1 to 12 msec range after excitation with light pulses (A = 6328 Å) of 100 μsec and 4.5 msec duration. We have confirmed the data of Tollin, Ruby, and Bertsch et al., on the time course of the delayed light in the msec range. New experiments, with 100 μsec flash excitation, on the time dependence of the delayed light emitted by Chlorella treated with 3‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea (DMU), hydroxylamine, methyl violgen, and various combinations of these chemicals are presented. Also, data on the dependence of the delayed light intensity on the intensity of the excitation light in the 1.5 and 5.0 msec range are reported. The square law dependence, reported by Jones, in the 140 and 250 msec range is confirmed in the 1.5 and 5.0 msec range at very low light levels.The experimental data on delayed light has been analyzed in terms of a model which incorporates triplet exciton fusion. The following major points result from this analysis: (1) A triplet exciton kinetic model can explain both the time dependence and the excitation intensity dependence of the delayed light emitted by Chlorella. (2) The density of triplet excitons predicted by the model from the observed delayed light intensity is much less than that which can be detected by flash photolysis measurements. Therefore, the failure of such measurements to detect triplet states in vivo does not disprove the model. (3) The possibility of changes in the rate of electron transfer reactions of photosynthesis is included in the kinetic model. The predictions from the model are compared with the effects of chemical additives on the time dependence of the delayed light decay. (4) The proposed triplet exciton model predicts that the delayed light intensity may, under certain specific conditions, be affected by a magnetic field. The negative result of an attempt to observe this effect is reported and discussed. (5) It is concluded that the proposed triplet ‘fusion’ model is a valid alternative to the electron‐hole recombination model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.