Abstract

Sir William Utting, in his ‘special review’ of residential care for children, asked himself two very particular questions: ‘Is there any point in persevering with residential care?’ and ‘Can it be revived?’ Utting's review had been commissioned as a direct result of ‘public concern about standards and practices in residential child care’ following publication of The Pindown experience and the protection of children: The Report of the Staffordshire Child Care Inquiry. This chapter describes the policy and practice context in which Utting's questions came to be asked in the first place. It argues that despite the long history of residential care in Britain, such fundamental questions have been asked many times in the past. In fact, in one form or another, they have been raised at almost every point of transition between successive welfare ideologies and practices. The chapter locates the administrative history of residential care for children in the same policy context as that in which social-work practice more generally has developed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.