Abstract

Abstract In today’s algorithmic society, access to large-scale datasets is the sine qua non for any economic actor to reap the benefits of data-driven innovation (DDI). This article explores alternative mechanisms of data management in large-scale processing environments which can bolster access in view of the shortcomings of the existing data ownership-centric system. The scope of the analysis is limited to non-personal data. First, this contribution elaborates on the features and shortcomings of the data ownership-centric system and the existing legislation on data access. In fact, despite its ground-breaking potential, data access is not a widely available resource. It is subject, meanwhile, to the ability of several actors to control it, originating from data holders’ position of de facto control over data (“data ownership”), which is mostly anchored in technological, behavioural, and legal access barriers. This ownership-oriented setting thus stifles data sharing and opportunities for novel reuses of data. Despite these concerns, EU secondary legislation and case law (including the “essential facilities doctrine” of competition law) have not yet offered appropriate means to enable data access across society. Second, this article investigates whether alternative systems of data management based on the commons is a viable solution to open up access to raw non-personal data (RNPD). The commons as a conceptual notion and institutional mechanism values access and freedom to operate, instead of power to appropriate. The article homes in on two main reasons which substantiate why commons management of RNPD can be desirable. On the one hand, RNPD can be deemed a cooperative infrastructural resource that calls for being pulled out of its factual enclosure (“structuralist approach” of the commons). On the other hand, grasping RNPD as a commons means valuing its functional nature, making data available to a wide number of actors for the fulfilment of fundamental rights and enhancing human flourishing (“functionalist approach”). The article concludes with some thoughts on the lines of research which are still to be explored to put the commons-based vision of data management into practice.

Highlights

  • Over the last decade, new and enhanced information-based technologies have fuelled the digital economy

  • The scrutiny discussed below homes in on raw non-personal data (“RNPD”), meaning any nonpersonal that is defined by its representative characters57 and has not undergone any automated or human activity of analysis, reuse or other manipulation aimed at extracting meaningful information from it or resulting from a creative effort

  • As stated by Morozov and Bria, ‘a new cluster of start-ups, SMEs, NGOs, cooperatives, and local communities can take advantage of that data to build apps and services most relevant to them and the wider community’ (Morozov and Bria 2018, 32), since they have a right to do so. This contribution has taken a first step towards depicting a management system of data based on access

Read more

Summary

Introduction

New and enhanced information-based technologies have fuelled the digital economy. Data feeds powerful algorithms, which turn it into valuable information and knowledge This new phase, known as the data economy, means that companies and public bodies can orient their activities in light of data analytics and produce goods and services at (nearly) zero marginal cost (Rifkin 2014). The core of non-personal data comprises different kinds of digital material: data generated by industrial machinery and farm equipment, sensor data produced in public transport, (real-time) data from online-accessible databases, and so forth This contribution will deal only with the core and set aside the blurry penumbra of mixed datasets and other controversial cases. These issues arise from (i) de facto data ownership, and (ii) a lack of legal rules enhancing access to non-personal data in large-scale processing environments.

De Facto Data Ownership
Data Access and the Law: an Access Seekerbased Taxonomy
Access Domains
Degrees of Access
Access Approaches
Data Access under Competition Law
Another Limitation
The Commons in Legal and Economic Scholarships
The Structuralist Approach
The Functionalist Approach
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call