Abstract

The paper reports on the outcomes of a Department of Culture, Museums and Sport (DCMS) funded project which provided resources for three groups of teachers in different subjects and age phases to have some time where they were freed from their teaching responsibilities, and also given time to meet together with other teachers to share ideas. The idea underpinning the project was to explore a model of continuing professional development for teachers which was different in approach to recent Department for Education and Skills (DfES) ‘strategy’ and training based approaches.The three groups of teachers (primary science, secondary history and secondary science) met together with curriculum tutors from the local School of Education to explore ideas about how to develop innovative approaches in aspects of their subject teaching. In addition to funding four days of supply cover for the teachers involved to meet, the teachers were also given at least two days of supply cover during the course of the project to develop their ideas. Towards the end of both academic years, the groups met again to share their ideas. The paper describes the outcomes of the project and the teachers’ perceptions of the process issues and problems involved in pedagogical innovation. The paper also considers some of the broader issues arising from the project, in terms of how to make the most effective use of teachers’ time, in an era when there are many competing demands on this finite resource.

Highlights

  • February, 2008 atrophy of teacher initiative, originality and imagination in approaches to subject pedagogy and the erosion of subject specific Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses

  • The underpinning hypothesis behind the project was that recent government initiatives in education in England have added to teachers’ overall workload and resulted in a lack of time and opportunity for teachers to develop their own ideas and talk about teaching and learning issues with fellow professionals

  • The overarching aims of the project were to use the funding to provide time for teachers to develop their ideas for innovative pedagogy in subject teaching, to be able to ‘try things out’ in areas of their subject which were of interest to them, and to provide time for them to meet together to discuss and share their ideas with other teachers

Read more

Summary

Funding for the project

The underpinning hypothesis behind the project was that recent government initiatives in education in England have added to teachers’ overall workload (see, for example Smithers and Robinson, 2000, NFER, 2000, Cockburn and Haydn, 2004) and resulted in a lack of time and opportunity for teachers to develop their own ideas and talk about teaching and learning issues with fellow professionals

The aims of the project
Teacher response to the project
The three stands of the project
Project ethos
Project activities
End of project teacher responses
Teachers’ reflections on the project
Outcomes and process issues
Findings
Implications for investment in post qualification development for teachers
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call